...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Project NatureConnect
Institute of Global Education
Organic Psychology
Special
NGO Consultant, United Nations Economic and Social Council
Practical distance learning to increase person/planet well being.
| SYNOPSIS: This article describes the history of an Ecology that is based on natural attraction, a funded, web of life, sensory science in action. Natural Attraction Ecology is an organic, nature-connected psychology tool that helps us improve health wellness and counseling. It enables our thinking and feeling to safely tap into the natural community that produces nature's grace, balance and restorative powers. Participants benefit from and strengthen their inborn love of nature as they master alternative therapist coaching, stress release management and holistic spiritual psychology. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Educating Counseling and Healing With Nature Supportive Degrees, Career Training Courses and Jobs On Line Project NatureConnect offers nature-centered distant learning that enables you to add the benefits of nature-connecting methods and credentials to your degree program and/or your skills, interests and hobbies. We honor your prior training and life experience by providing grants and equivalent education credit for it. You may take accredited or professional CEU coursework and/or obtain a Nature-Connected Degree or Certificate in most disciplines or personal interests. A partial subject list is located at the bottom of this page.
ARTICLE (DRAFT): A History of the Webstring Natural Attraction Model Natural Attraction Ecology: The Web of Life, Well Being and our Prejudice Against Nature Janet Thomas with Michael J. Cohen ABSTRACT: The state of the world demonstrates that, although biologically and spiritually human beings are born as part of nature, contemporary people suffer the deterioration of personal, social and environmental well-being. This occurs because, motivated by excessive profits and power, industrial society socializes our thinking to be prejudiced against nature's web of life community and its balanced perfection within and around us. Nature is the major renewing source of the well-being of life on Earth yet, on average, over 95 percent of our time and 99 percent of our thinking is detached from the self-corrective ecology of the web of life that, via natural attractions, organizes itself to produce the web's unpolluted, self-propagating optimums of life, diversity, and cooperation, beauty, community, purity and well-being. Between the years of 1959-2007, while living and learning in reasonable all-season contact with the grace of natural areas, Michael J. Cohen established an accredited, nature-connected education, counseling and relationship building tool. An organic form of Applied Ecopsychology, Ecotherapy and Environmental Education, the science of its Natural Attraction Ecology helped people make conscious sensory contact with the flow of natural systems in and about them, backyard or backcountry. Its hands-on process helped individuals reduce stress and disorders and increase well being by enabling them to think with 53 natural sensitivities, like the web of life worked. By creating moments that let Earth teach, individuals identified their natural senses by their right name. This reduced their duality. It empowered their multiple natural sensitivity intelligences to transform the prejudices against nature in their psyche into constructive relationships with the regenerative ways of natural systems. The art of this social technology helped people invite nature's restorative powers to recycle the industrial garbage in their mind that blocked nature's purifying flow from improving how they reasoned, felt and acted. Article: If you don't live in your feelings, you don't live in the real world. Feelings are the truth. - David Viscott Part One This article addresses a fundamental scientific flaw in the thinking of industrial society, a flaw that not only reduces personal, social and environmental well being, but also deprives us of the benefits provided by a powerful remedy for the flaw, a remedy that this article provides. For almost sixty years, Michael J. Cohen has been an environmental educator and psychologist who, from many decades of university training and living and learning in natural areas, became aware that our socialization in industrial society prejudiced our mind. It conditioned us to know nature and ourselves through abstract stories that separated our thinking from the beauty and balanced ways of nature and this created our disorders. The separation biased the way we think to believe that it alone was intelligent and that our thinking made more sense than the natural attraction way that nature worked to produce its eons of self-correcting perfection. Upon completion of his undergraduate and graduate studies in natural science and counseling in 1957, for 49 years Cohen increasingly lived, learned and researched ecologically sound relationships as he guided expedition education camping and study groups into natural areas for periods of thirty days to a year at a time. From this remarkable outdoor experience he recognized that he and Planet Earth were equally alive and shared all aspects of life except one. Over time, he developed a sensory nature-connecting model that empowered its participants to genuinely connect their thinking and relationships to the balance and renewing powers of nature, the real thing, backyard or backcountry. Cohen's unique Webstring Natural Attraction Model enabled the thinking of its participants to sensibly become familiar with, respect and enhance nature's nurturing life-flow in and around them. It benefited them by giving them the means to eliminate the separation of the life of their psyche from nature's restorative intelligence and balance. He observed that it was this separation that made industrial society reduce personal, social and environmental well being. Today, the Model's process helps us transform our hurtful ignorance and deterioration of the web of life into mutually supportive relationships with its natural systems in the environment, other people and ourselves. In addition, the Model gives us the means to teach others how to easily accomplish this. The Significance of this Article. The mission of Akamai University has been the amelioration of major world problems and creation of sustainable lifestyles and global practices as hallmarks of responsible individual and corporate world citizenship. As generators of new knowledge and developers of new systems, its sole mission has been the advancement of the human condition and sustainability of the planet. This article describes the contributions of the Webstring Natural Attraction Model to help the mission succeed in meeting its goal. To this end, it contributes to public knowledge the unique processes of Cohen's lifetime of research, experience and expertise in developing his Model and the programs, methods and materials it has produced. Because the Webstring Model has successfully involved people in the process of reducing their destructive relationships with nature, the Model is significant because it is far more experiential and practical than theoretical. It provides us with the means to achieve our most valued goals. This is important because we best increase well-being by owning and using tools that help us build mutually supportive relationships with nature that reduce our dysfunctions. By 1948, history and current events demonstrated that our thinking in industrial society was programmed to conquer, exploit and control nature for profit, not to embrace nature. Embracing nature was considered, flakey, subjective, unscientific, touchy-feely tree-hugging. We not only learned to think that loving nature impeded “progress” and “economic growth,” we were paid and in other ways rewarded to think this way. This was no small matter nor was it a secret. It was a matter of massive and long-term public consciousness that industrial society had bonded to support our harmful ways, even when we abhorred their personal and global negative effects. By also learning to ignore appropriate tools to deal with this phenomenon, most people were rendered helpless and apathetic in this regard. They knew that the nature-destructive thinking and excessive ways of industrial society deteriorated natural systems within and around them. They had yet to know the source of this dilemma and how to remedy it. This article contributes that information. The Process of the Webstring Natural Attraction Model In his classic 1953 book, The Web of Life, a first book of Ecology, John Storer, incorporating Eugene Odum's scientific methodology in Fundamentals of Ecology, brought to public attention the fundamental truth that all aspects of life are related to each other and that this gives life the ability to create its own supportive environment and healthy balance. Storer noted that, through Ecology, he described the web of life with respect to what could be identified as an orderly progression of significant food chains and energy threads that were only a small part of the massive facts and forces that go into making the physical global life community. Ecology provided scientific evidence for the concept of a universal form of oneness, that all things are connected. This had long been part of human thinking in many cultures. In 1972, two years after the first Earth Day, Cohen watched an environmental education specialist in Smokey Mountain National Park ecologically demonstrate how all threads, not just food and energy threads, of the natural community fit into a single pattern to connect, grow and sustain the massive web of life that Storer and Odum identified. The specialist went beyond learning from book knowledge and theory alone. She involved her audience in an environmental studies model, in an activity that helped them bring to mind, include and validate their personal and professional life experiences. In a natural area, she engaged them in a web of life ecology activity that enabled people of all ages to understand, model and feel the natural environment so they could more appreciate, support and protect it. The specialist's activity consisted of placing a group of forty park visitors, including children, in a circle and giving each person a card to wear. On each card some part of nature was inscribed: bird, soil, water, tree, air, wolf etc. A large ball of string was then used to demonstrate the interconnecting relationships between things in nature. For example the bird ate insects so the string was unrolled and passed from the "bird person" through the hands of the "insect person." The string represented their connection. The insect lived in a flower, so the string was further unrolled across the circle through the hands of the "flower person." The flower was supported by the soil so the string continued across the circle and through the hands of the “soil person.” In time, the ball of string became a web of strings (webstrings) that that passed through the hands of the participants and interconnected all parts of nature with each other. It was a science-based, ecologically correct and environmentally sound educational portrayal of the total global life community, including minerals. The activity continued by requesting that the group of web of life participants gently lean away from the web they built while holding it. They sensed and enjoyed how this thin string now peacefully united, supported and interconnected them and all of life. The specialist had them note that the greater the number of nature-representatives that were in the circle, the stronger the web would become. Some people shared how the web was beautiful or how past contact with nature had been a powerful experience that opened new vistas, renewed or even healed them. Most acknowledged that being in nature reduced their stress, even on just a short walk in the park. Some said that nature was their higher power. A few participants observed that there was no garbage or pollution in this web of life community, nothing was left out, everything belonged and cooperated, even though many things, like a mouse and a tree, were extremely different from each other. The activity and its discussion evoked feelings of trust, integrity and unity amongst the participants along with a greater respect for nature's peaceful diversity. Having involved people in a webstring model that captured and conveyed nature's perfection, the specialist then cut one strand of the web signifying the pollution or loss of a species, habitat or relationship. The weakening effect on all was noted, not only physically through the string, but also by a sadness that many participants felt. As people shared other environmental and social destruction or pollution that they had witnessed, or knew about, another and another string was cut. String by string, the web's integrity, support and power disintegrated along with its spirit. Because this reflected the reality of their lives, participants, some in tears, said that it they felt hurt, despair and futility while others became angry about the loss. Webstrings, Real or Imagined? Sixteen years later, in 1988, at an environmental education conference where the same web of life activity was informally demonstrated, Cohen asked the activity participants if they had ever visited a natural area and had actually seen strings interconnecting things there. They said, no, that would be crazy. He responded, "If there are no strings there, what then are the actual strands that interconnect and hold the natural community together in balance?" It became very, very quiet. Too quiet. That silence flagged a momentous missing fact in contemporary thinking, consciousness and relationships, a fact that is still missing today. Participants concluded that the question went outside the scope of environmental education, environmental studies or science. However, Cohen argued that webstrings were a vital part of the web of life and survival. He said they were just as real and important as the plants, animals, minerals and energies that they interconnected, including humanity. If things were really connected, as in the model, then the strings were as true, or more true, than 2 + 2 = 4. They were facts as genuine as trees, thirst or motion, water, sight or sunlight. Without knowing, sensing or respecting the webstrings that make up nature and our inner nature, we broke, injured and ignored them, and part of ourselves as interconnected citizens of this global community. As members of the web of life, we were born with the ability to sense, think with and benefit from the webstrings that connected us to nature and our living planet, Mother Earth. To identify and explain the strings in the web of life, from his 38-year livelihood living and learning in natural areas Cohen modified the web of life activity. His goal was to help its participants be fully aware of webstrings, what they were and their significance. In his version of it, he did not start the demonstration with the labeled cards. Instead, he began it by asking participants to: 1) visit the natural area around them for five minutes, 2) find two or three things there that for at least five seconds they felt attracted to, 3) identify what they liked about these attractive natural things and then 4) return to the web of life circle. Upon returning, participants, in turn, wrote on a card that they later wore, one of the natural attractions they found, one that had not already been chosen by another person to insure an optimum of diversity. To help people integrate the attractions they found in nature as part of the web-of life activity, Cohen explained to the participants that, although they could not notice it, the large ball of string faintly pulsated like a heart because it was the source of conscious attraction, Its pulse resulted from, back and forth, being attracted to survive in the moment and then to attractions that drew it into more supportive survival in the next moment. In addition, whenever he passed the string through a person's hand, it was always from left to right. Significantly, Cohen added two more cards to the activity. Each of them was labeled “person,” and after all the webstring connections were made between all the participants, including the two people labeled “person,” the two “person” people were additionally connected to each other by a special red ribbon. It lay across the top of all the other webstrings in the circle. Cohen explained that the ribbon signified that people inherited a sense of literacy, a unique ability to connect with each other by thinking and communicating through words, numbers and stories. Most participants agreed that the web of life itself communicated or communed through webstrings but things in nature did not directly think with, understand or use spoken or written words, numbers or stories. In this sense, nature and the natural were illiterate and our “red ribbon” stories were foreign to them. Cohen noted that this disconnection was very dangerous because it was self-evident that to be part of a system a thing must be in communication with the system and vice versa. Cohen added another step to the original activity. He had participants slowly, with their fingers and free hand, move the strings through their hand from left to right so that the pulsating string moved/flowed throughout the web. This depicted the long-term flow of natural systems and their attraction energies. It portrayed how the “waste products” of one natural thing were a life-giving contribution to other things, including people. For example, the carbon dioxide we exhaled was food for plants. The model also demonstrated that whenever any member of the web of life community restricted the flow of the string, the string was stretched and stressed until the member cooperated. This tension modified its pulse. However, if the restriction was not corrected, the flow and well being of each member, as well as the whole system, was adversely affected. This included a reduction in the well being of the non-supportive member. In his enhanced web of life activity, during the part of the activity when the strings were being cut, Cohen suggested that it was inaccurate, incomplete or biased “red ribbon” human thoughts and stories about life and natural relationships that mislead people to excessively cut the webstrings or restrict their flow. Non-supportive stories impacted the strings, and therefore the whole web, as they passed through the hands of people. For example, the story of industrial society socialized people to ignore the attraction string flow in each moment as their source of survival and, instead, for profit, survive by excessively devouring or exploiting other members of the web community. This occurred even to the point that other web members became extinct and disappeared from the global life community. Participants admitted that this occurred in their lives out of habit or necessity so they could not stop injuring the strings, even when their sense of reason knew it made sense to stop. For example, they could not walk to work if their workplace was not within walking distance. Since well before the day that the web of life activity was first designed, Earth and its people were increasingly suffering from "cut string" disintegration, yet we continued to cut the webstrings at an alarming rate. Few disputed the accuracy of our situation as depicted by the Web of Life model yet, sadly, people witnessed and felt, especially since Earth Day, the continued cut-string deterioration of the natural world and their relationships with it, each other and themselves as part of it. In one of his later workshops, Cohen helped participants answer, “What are the strings?” the question that he originally asked at the conference. He suggested that to answer it, they explore and express what they had been sensing or feeling as part of the web of life because the life of their psyche and mind was also part of the web. To this end, he had participants do an activity to help them discover what webstrings might be: “Find any attractive object or thing in the natural area here, and with your total energy pull or push it, but don't dislodge it from its attachment or move it from its place.” Through this activity participants were able to physically sense and feel some of the attraction energies that connected things to each other and the whole of the web of life, including attractions in air and water. They also became aware that their felt-sense attractions to things in nature were also webstrings and that webstrings pulsated. As they changed from moment to moment, they re-registered in the things they connected. For example, if a person saw a bird and the bird saw the person, the bird might move, the person might move in return and this pulse would continue until other attractions called. Both the bird and person registered and reacted to the in-balance webstring senses of motion sight and distance, and perhaps many others, as well. In time, participants recognized that webstrings were connective attractions by all of life to obtain things like food, water, habitat, energy, minerals, warmth, community and support. Soon they realized that, in their psyche, these attractions were also specific senses or desires that they experienced such as hunger, thirst, trust, belonging, respiration and place. They saw how, in the web of life demonstration, every part of the global life community, from the spaces between sub-atomic particles, to weather systems, to the solar system, to the life of their mind was included and was part of the web and that everything consisted of, and was held together by webstring attractions and their aware/conscious contact with of each other. This explained why, like the whole web of strings they had constructed, nothing ordinarily fell apart or became garbage without cause. Webstrings naturally bonded things together in mutually supportive ways. Natural things acted as if they consented with each other to support their individual lives and all of life. “All
week long I have been fantasizing about communing with my precious
little Christmas cactus, a favorite family member who came to me as a
Mother's Day gift from my son about five years ago. Just now when
I looked over at it to say (wordlessly) “I'm going to ask your consent
now!”, I felt a grinning response of “Finally!” and sat for a
long moment just taking in the details of its smooth leaves, the way
its branches now lean on the edge of the pot and hang over, the moist
soil that it has lived in for so long in its little pot, everything so
familiar- the little shells that hang out in the top of the pot making
a little nature spot in my home... So I asked permission, and such a warm rush of welcome came that as it hit me I took a breath in, and my dog Joe, asleep in the chair, let out a long, comfy, groaning sigh. I felt a little nervous about tugging. Christmas cactus leaves are delicate and can detach so easily, but the cactus reassured me that because I would be feeling it, with it, I would not pull too hard; it would be perfect. So, I reached a finger out and touched the top of the leaf so lightly- heavenly to touch. I took the leaf between my thumb and forefinger and held it there, and then felt myself connect with the plant, so that we were not exactly separate anymore- and then gently tugged, so that I could “feel” all the way up the leaf past several segments, as I saw and felt the pull extend back into the branch and myself. As I did so, my awareness came alive to the sentience of the plant. I felt I was interacting with another aware being. It was the most amazing feeling! Suddenly three of us were in the room- me, dog and cactus. Amazing feeling. I respect this plant a lot. I appreciate this plant a lot. It truly is a gift to me, to share my home with this fine plant. I released the leaf from between thumb and finger, and slid my finger along its edge to the serrated, squared-off tip, and it was as if I was sitting fingertip to fingertip with another person. The plant laughed. Is this possible? Am I imagining this for my own enjoyment, or is this real? It felt real. I want it to be real. I hope it is real. I am going to keep doing this because it feels wonderful. I discovered that am a person who gets good feelings from webstring communing with non-humans, opening to delicate touch and deeply sensing another's way of life. This activity increased my feeling of self-worth. I feel worthy when I connect with Nature! - Journal of Anonymous Webstring Model Participant Webstring Senses and Sensibilities Over the years, most of Cohen's web of life activity participants were college or graduate students, many were professional educators, counselors or coaches. While evaluating the activity most participants agreed that the webstring activity helped them see that in the web of life, some form of restorative and connective webstring energy produced, balanced and unified nature. They said they began to realize that the web of life accomplished this without producing the garbage or pollution, or the excessive abusiveness, disorders, isolation and stress, that our misinformed “red ribbon” stories produced. They could see and feel how the webstring attraction connections of the global life community enabled the community to produce nature's well being and purity, that this was intelligent and that it included the natural part of themselves. Webstrings added new meaning to thinking or acting sensibly. To come fully to their senses they had to come to the web of life and make sense with it. Because all webstrings are connected with each other, like a spider web, some participants noted that when one webstring was cut, moved or injured, they could feel it, that all webstrings become aware of the change. They could see that because there was no garbage or pollution in the circle, although webstrings are very diverse, their flowed, in concert, recycled and corrected whatever ailed the web of life and this process purified and prevented runaway disorders in nature. Some participants shared that it was for this reason that they deeply respected and appreciated the grace and restorative healing powers of nature and that they considered nature to be spiritual or divine because it and its intelligence were not created by humanity. We Are Webstrings in Action To help participants experience that they also consisted of webstrings and their value, at the completion of the demonstration Cohen asked each participant to do a short activity that he modified from an exercise that he had learned from Dr. Clifford Knapp. He gave them a statement that provided them with a means to identify what they appreciated about the things in nature that they had been attracted to in the beginning of the activity. The statement was, “I like the (natural thing) that attracted me because:” and they then added to the statement why they liked the thing in nature that they selected. Once they had done this, Cohen asked them to find the same thing in themselves by making the same statement about themselves. For example “I like (or love) the rock because it was warm and colorful and very strong so it can be what it is,” became, “I like (or love) myself because I am warm and colorful and very strong so I can be what I am.” The participants then assisted each other in identifying and validating the webstring parts of themselves that the modified statement, in metaphor, had helped them locate. Cohen suggested that this webstring part of them was always in them in some form, recognized or not. He said that it had to be in them, that it was the part of them that registered the natural attraction they selected when visiting the natural area. Otherwise, he asked, how could they have been attracted to it? This discovery often helped participants find and strengthen their self-worth. Cohen based this activity on the principles of the Thematic Apperception and Rorschach inkblot tests and it often helped participants strengthen their self-worth. For example, they wrote in email journals: “I love this dragonfly because it is ancient beauty. As a continuation of the Webstring Model, over the years Cohen created an additional 146 similar nature-connecting activities. Each enabled people to further locate in the web of life, their natural self, its value and their often-overlooked connection to nature. The Webstring Void As part of his revised web of life demonstration, Cohen helped participants realize from their personal experience, and from studies by others, that, on average, over 99 percent of thinking in industrial society was separated from and out of tune with the web of life in natural areas and that people in industrial society spent over 95 percent of their time indoors. Many of his participants were mid-career professionals with expertise in a wide variety of disciplines. He asked them to try and see that the “normal” disappearance of most webstrings from our consciousness was due to our excessive red-ribbon, literate thinking, training and communication. It separated our mind from nature through its webstring-isolated stories for all but twelve hours of our entire life. This, he argued, produced a profound webstring void in our psyche, an uncomfortable emptiness, a sensory deprivation of nature that we constantly tried to fill. We felt this void because Mother Nature ordinarily fulfilled and nurtured us via our webstring connections with her, but we were socialized to be disconnected from nature. As participants shared their experiences about their disconnection from the web of life, within and around them, they began to discover that it was the webstring void in their psyche and lives that made them excessively want, and that when they wanted there was never enough so that they always wanted more. This helped them recognize that it was their continual wanting that produced the excessiveness that was the core of our most tenacious personal, social and environmental problems. They became aware that industrial society had conditioned them into a destructive separation of their thinking from how webstrings supportively worked in balance as an essence of sustaining natural life in balance, including their lives. Making Webstrings "Visible" As a webstring attraction experiment, and with their consent, Cohen had a mixed group of students and adults do a safe, 24-hour camping solo on wild islands and coastal areas in Maine. With minimal but sufficient camping gear and food, but nothing else, the goal was to sense and follow natural webstring attractions that appeared during their day and night while they were immersed in nature and isolated from humanity and industrial society. Shortly after this solo, the same group did a similar 12-hour webstring “solo” but this time in a busy shopping mall. There, they were asked to select a part of the mall that ordinarily attracted them and, staying in it, observe what was attractive, but not talk to anyone, similar to when on their camping solo. In general, the discussions and papers that emanated from each of the two solo experiences showed that most of the group wanted to stay longer on the wilderness bay solo and that they returned from it joyful and invigorated in a good way. In contrast, many participants could not last 12 hours in the mall, most found it oppressive or deadening after a while and two of them developed headaches. Many said that, over time, their webstring attractions in the mall were numbed by increased boredom, stuffiness and a lack of deeper meaning unless they provided it. They explained why the wilderness solo felt better: “I am a person who feels great when I take the time to shut off the inner chatter and explore nature with many senses When I do so, I feel that I am part of a huge organism called earth, and that I share in the collective wisdom and strength of Earth. These activities that I have been doing are deceptively simple: they are powerful and healing. (I spend time in nature, I immerse myself in it, what difference could a few simple words or particular approach make……………..all the difference in the world………yes, deceptively simple….amazingly effective!)” Through additional nature-connection activities that Cohen designed, his participants further experienced that their uncomfortable separation from nature subsided when they genuinely connected their thinking with nature via webstrings. This connection helped their webstring sensitivity attractions register in their consciousness as sensations and feelings so that they could gain sensible natural fulfillment by thinking and relating to and through them. Participants became super aware that the substitute artificial satisfactions, that society produced to satisfy their nature-disconnection wants, seldom had the balancing and renewing natural powers of webstrings and that attractive substitutes for nature, like those found in a mall, often produced stressful side effects in natural systems in people and in the environment. By 1988, in his book How Nature Works, Cohen validated from personal experience, and research by himself and others, that we registered the interconnection of webstrings throughout nature, including people, as at least 53 different natural attraction senses that some called affinities or natural loves. He found that “red ribbon” stories that did not accurately contain or convey these webstrings tended to abstract (meaning pull apart) relationships and reality. This slowed down or restricted the flow of webstrings. It adversely affected the well being of the web of life, including people. It was for this reason that Cohen helped his participants call a webstring that they sensed in natural area, by the correct name attached to that sensation. For example natural senses or sensations called thirst, place and gravity were webstrings as were natural senses of trust and community. Accurately labeling their webstring sensations as natural senses helped participants bond their red ribbon terms and stories to the web of life community. This connection enabled them to reduce the prejudiced against nature duality that existed between their Industrial Society thinking and their natural self. They could increase well-being by building sensible nature-connected relationships in Industrial Society as they weeded out its hallucinatory, prejudiced against nature stories. They could, instead, build sensible nature-connected relationships because the were in contact with the real thing. Through the natural attractions in his web of life ecology and sensation demonstration, Cohen continued to help people identify webstrings and their value. Once they experienced them, participants not only acknowledged them, many also acknowledged that since childhood they had always been somewhat aware of them as sensations and feelings that they took for granted or learned to deny, sensations such as thirst, community, place, gravity, motion, temperature, love, nurturing and trust. In a New York City workshop, Cohen had a group of teachers and students from the Walden School visit a natural area (Central Park) and individually, for fifteen minutes, note what natural attractions and senses they could discover while they were there. The list of sensory webstrings they experienced included sight, belonging, beauty, reason, touch, place, color, language, taste, reasoning, pleasure, hormonal, smell, peace, appreciation, intuition, sound, texture, form, gravity, sex, gravity, motion, fear, temperature, nurturing, trust, belonging, companionship, empathy, respiration, compassion, consciousness, pain and isolation. Some participants said that, like a little red wagon painted blue, the excessively nature separated way that they had been socialized to think, to their loss, had hidden webstrings and their value from their awareness much of the time. They noted that most webstrings felt good and supportive, and those that didn't, such as pain or fear, motivated them to seek those that did. For example, one person said they could see that they didn't necessarily run away from an oncoming disaster as much as they ran for their life. Sharon, an adult woman became an example of the disappearance of webstrings from our thinking and its consequence: Sharon was asked to choose one attractive natural object, of many, that had been placed, out of sight, in a bag. She selected a piece of wood because its shape and smoothness attracted her when she explored the bag with her hand. Once she removed and then saw the piece of wood that attracted her, she reacted negatively to it. She said that she did not know why she no longer liked the wood now that she saw it. Days later, she shared that this had evidently been a subconscious reaction. She had remembered, originally through a webstring in a dream, that the wood was the same shade of green as were the walls of her room where, as a child, she had been molested. This webstring had been, and remained, injured and hidden. Cohen, who was trained on a doctoral level as a biologist and counselor, found that, as with Sharon, during contemporary society's conquest of nature, we psychologically numbed or hurt webstrings as we injured, failed to exercise, demeaned or separated them from their nurturing and restorative origins in the web of life. To avoid consciously feeling the pain of this separation, our psyche placed our hurting webstrings in our pre-conscious or subconscious mind. Hidden there, the important natural information that webstrings contained seldom entered our thinking or helped our reasoning wisely reduce our destructive conquest of nature around and within us. Cohen could see in his expedition education groups that these injured webstrings limited our lives. People avoided relationships that they thought would activate their wounded webstrings, would bring that pain into consciousness and make them suffer. From this observation, Cohen designed the Webstring Model to include activities that helped its participants work with webstrings that were not injured. This is why he added to the Web of Life Activity, that its participants should start it by locating attractions in natural areas. Over time, this further developed into his “Gaining Consent from Nature” activity. Back to Basics: the Inconvenient Truth To help the public recognize their limited relationship with webstrings and how to correct it, in a 1990 environmental conference with Al Gore and Bill McKibben Cohen did a webstring presentation: Cohen asked a mixed group of scientists and educators what the formula for water was. The group responded “H2O;” water was a combination of the elements known as Hydrogen and Oxygen. He then asked them “Since we know that the water cycle is a global phenomenon that includes the land sea and air, and we are aware that water flows through us, too, what is it that we all know that brings water into us yet our bodies neither burst from too much water nor dehydrate from not enough water?” Participants offered answers such as “salinity differentials,” “osmotic pressure variables,” “environmental determinates,” “dehydration factors,” and the like. Nobody offered that it was the sense or sensation of thirst, in fact some participants were upset when Cohen tendered it as an additional answer. Cohen suggested that a water-governing factor was the sense or sensation of thirst and that participants were aware of this on some level for they had experienced thirst since the day they were born. He offered that people inherently were aware that, intelligently, thirst turned on and attracted us to drink water and to bring it into us, and that thirst intelligently turned off to attract us to stop drinking water. He said that with respect to humanity, our sense of thirst (a webstring) was scientifically as much a part of the water cycle as any other part of it. He added that without the existence of water, we probably would not have inherited a sense of thirst, for we would not need it, it would be meaningless, that, in this sense, thirst was evidence for the existence of water. He showed that thirst was a webstring, one of many sensuous ways that nature registered itself in our consciousness so that we could sensibly think and relate to nature through webstrings.From Cohen's presentation, Al Gore included Cohen's book, Connecting With Nature, creating moments that let Earth teach, in the bibliography of his book, Earth in the Balance, ecology and the human spirit. In Connecting With Nature, Cohen had listed the 53 natural webstring senses that he and his students had experienced in natural areas and human community relationships. He looked forward to Gore sharing this information as part of Gore's effort to establish balanced relationships with our living planet. Cohen had introduced the 53 webstring sensitivities in his book, noting that they helped our thinking connect and balance nature within us to nature around us and that these senses could be further subdivided into the more than 100 senses experienced by people who accurately predicted earthquakes. As an example, he noted that blindfolded people away from home who have magnets attached to their heads can't point to their home nearly as well as blindfolded people without magnets attached to their heads. (http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s148725.htm) Cohen further described the 53 webstring sensitivities in his 1995 book Reconnecting With Nature noting in it that between the years of 1961-1978, researcher Guy Murchie made an exhaustive inquiry about webstrings. Murchie painstakingly scrutinized scientific studies about natural senses, studies that appeared in hundreds of edition of scientific books and periodicals during those 17 years. In 1986 Murchie personally told Cohen that scientific methodology and research had identified over eighty different biological senses/sensitivities which pervade the natural world. Murchie said he additionally verified this through authorities at the Harvard Biological Laboratories. All these senses that, for literary convenience, he clumped together as 31 senses in his book The Seven Mysteries of Life published by Houghton Mifflin in 1978. From Murchie's original collection, Cohen identified 53 natural senses that he and his students had experienced during his 26 years living and teaching outdoors. Each was a flowing strand in the web of life, a webstring that helped to hold the world together through attraction communication. Cohen recognized that there were many additional sensitivities found in nature that humans did not consciously register, for example ultraviolet light, atomic radiation, or high ranges of sound that dogs, but not humans, could register. He reasoned that these sensitivities may not have been necessary for human consciousness with respect to survival in balance with nature. Picking up where Murchie had left off, for a year, time permitting, Cohen read articles in Science News that continued to validate the existence of a wide variety of natural senses that existed beyond the five senses. Young infants were reported to display the sense of place and provided evidence for early capacities to have knowledge about physical objects and to reason about objects in motion. Proteins demonstrated a sense of computation, some bacteria chemically communicated amongst themselves and seemed conscious of the patterns of their colonies, other bacteria were attracted to cold and thrived at zero degrees Centigrade beneath glaciers. Dogs could sense cancer, forthcoming epileptic attacks in people, and their masters leaving work miles away. People could intuit that folks they could not see were staring at them. Although the research of investigators like Ames, Gesell, Pearce, Rivlin, Gravelle, Samuels, Sheppard, Sheldrake, Spelke, LePoncin, Wynn and many scores of others since 1978, had, not intentionally, further validated our multisensory nature, the full significance of it had yet to be recognized by industrial society. Our prejudicial addiction to our nature-separated lives and thinking kept these webstring natural senses and their value hidden from our immediate awareness. For this reason we were frustrated by a lack of fulfillment that resulted because our thoughts and behavior were "non-sense" with respect to our relationship with natural systems and the web of life. Since most of our natural senses were not recognized as such, thoughtful individuals would ask Cohen how they could determine if these natural senses actually existed. In response to their questions, Cohen requested them to acknowledge that they were able to sense and feel "thirst." He then asked them to name the five senses that we are taught we know and learn from, and then identify which one of the five was thirst. If that did not prove satisfactory, he would ask, "Which one of the five senses is our sense of gravity? Do you recognize that we inherently sense gravity? Try this little demonstration: become conscious of gravity and your reaction to it, then, let go of that sensitivity; stop reacting to it." People who followed his instructions began to slump to the ground or their chair. The could not hold their head up. They ended up as relaxed mass of quivering humanity that could not support itself because it ignored its sense of gravity. Cohen suggested that our industrial economy fueled itself by keeping our webstrings discontent, further irritating them through advertising and then selling us products that satisfied the irritation. However, when unadulterated, our webstring attraction sensitivities were the web of life promoting well being. Reconnecting With Nature said that Industrial Society's stories had encouraged our literate brain to conquer nature and the natural, we learned to conquer and subdue our natural senses. Our nature disconnected sense of reason had been trained to exalt the few senses that our industrial stories used to overpower our other senses and the natural world. We exploited and demeaned the remaining 45 natural senses that communed about how the natural world works its perfection and enabled us to participate in the process, as had more natural cultures. Overwhelmed and numbed, these 53 webstring senses were a vast missing part of a responsible story about Earth, ourselves, community and about choosing how and when to act where. Without webstrings registering in consciousness, our choices were limited and our thinking was "half vast." As Carl Jung and others had noted, our abstract thinking was no more reasonable or discriminating, logical and consistent than were our feelings and David Viscott recognized that if we didn't live in our feelings, we didn't live in the real world; feelings were the truth. Cohen indicated that his time in natural areas had taught him that our abstract/literate thinking in conjunction with conscious sensorycontact with attractions in natural areas could be a balanced 9-leg way we learned to put our natural senses into reasonable words. Our challenge was to recognize that the prejudicial, excessively nature separated parts of ourselves and our culture were unreasonable, that the absence of more than 45 webstrings from our consciousness was the mother of our collective madness, our runaway wars, pollution, dysfunction, disease, mental illness, apathy, abusiveness and violence. Without these webstrings, our consciousness abandoned our natural sensory "inner child," and that same inner child in other people and species. It disintegrated the creative passions that would otherwise bring about community, balance and positive change peacefully. He offered that anybody could choose to help reverse this destructive situation by learning how to use and teach the organic psychology found in the Webstring Model. In his book, Cohen offered the list of 53 natural senses with an important reminder: Each sense was a distinct sensory webstring attraction that in nature had no name for itself, for nature did not use names. Each webstring could awaken many natural parts of us when we used it to connect with the natural world in the environment and people. That touchy-feely, hands-on, connecting experience, not his list, catalyzed personal wisdom, growth and balance. His list only provided information in abstract language that registered on our webstring of consciousness and fed and guided our senses of reason, language and consciousness, our story way of knowing. However, without passion, reason and language were ineffective when it came to enjoying responsible behavior, growth and change. Reason and language were only 4% of our inherent means to know and love nature, life and each other. An additional 51 other sense groups completed the process. Without them awake and well in our consciousness, we experienced apathy, we don't participate and our problems continued. Cohen wrote that the list of 53 senses should be used in conjunction with visiting natural areas and with exposing our indoor conditioning to the many natural senses awakened in nature. To do this was reasonable, for after we experience a sense, knowing and speaking its right name helped to reintroduce and strengthened that sensation in our consciousness. There we could think with it. This process non-verbally connected, rejuvenated and educated us. It extended us to safely reach into the natural world in order to more fully sense and make sense of our lives and all of life. It worked because once we experienced the process and its wisdom, we owned it. We would never be able to fully return to our former way of knowing. Thinking With Webstrings Cohen's nature-reconnecting activities, that the Webstring Model offers, enable Project NatureConnect participants to safely bring webstrings back into their lives and thinking. Their evaluations of their participation show that the presence of the self-correcting ways of webstrings helped them organically reinstate naturally balanced personal and environmental well being. Some said webstrings, in congress made them aware of our natural common sense, that important answers actually were “blowing in the wind” and that they could be found by engaging in webstring natural attraction activities. “From this webstring activity I learned that the smallest amount of time spent in the right way can lead to feelings of oneness with the earth, and peaceful feelings, and that nature will surprise you if you allow it to show you itself the way it wants you to see it. I found that peaceful feelings can rub off on the creatures around me, including people, and their peacefulness rubbed off on me, too.” Webstring Model connection activities also helped participants translate webstring attraction feelings into language so that they could share their webstring experiences, through their special red ribbon of literacy, to other individuals, even by email. In this way, their sensory connections with the web helped them feelingly express and validate themselves in thoughts and words that corrected, improved and strengthened human reasoning and relationships. Their webstring communications unified them with others so they were able to think and feel more in unity, like nature works through webstring communion. They noted that they enjoyed sensing the power of nature's perfection and that the activities helped it continually flow into their mind and relationships. They reported that the webstring connection process helped them recycle the socialized “red ribbon” contamination of their thinking and feeling by industrial society and transform it into mutually supportive attractions and relationships. "There have been countless times that a family member, friend or companion and I would be camping, hiking or surfing and one of us would say “Oh my gosh, look!” We would simply shake our heads in amazement at sight we were witnessing. These are some of my favorite memories. I remember feeling so extremely in-tune with the other person, and especially because neither one of us would try and describe what we saw &/or felt, someone may have even said the words 'I cannot describe it', but we knew not to try, that trying to put words to our experience might ruin the moment. Later we could write about it or discuss it." Today, the mission of the Webstring Model is to assist its participants to benefit from the power of webstring connection and support and to teach others how to do the same. Through the Model, the natural world, backyard or backcountry, becomes a remarkable classroom, library and therapist that participants treasure. It helps them peacefully co-create a future in balance with themselves, each other and the global life community.
Webstrings and Prejudice Against Nature By using the framework of the webstring model as a basis for exploring how nature works in people and places, between 1978 and 1982, Cohen and his students became aware that our thinking in industrial society was paid or otherwise rewarded to believe that we increase progress and well being as we profit from our conquest, exploitation and control of our natural webstring senses and the web of life. His outdoor, expedition education, travel/study learning groups noted that while living at home they had been socialized to believe incorrect stories including the falsehoods that nature was not intelligent, it was a dangerous and bloody tooth and claw affair, it had no soul or spirit and that the way we learn to think and create is superior to how nature works. They saw they had been taught that people were created as “kings of nature,” and, as such, people had more rights to life than did other members of the web of life. By experiencing natural areas through first-hand visits to them across the United States, the destructive psychological and environmental effects from our demeaning of nature and from severely separating ourselves from nature, became apparent to participants in Cohen's programs. The "trashed" deterioration of nature that they observed in natural areas across the country demonstrated that to think that nature was inferior or bad was incorrect and harmful. Sadly, they also experienced that, with respect to nature, people did not readily change their thoughts, feelings or acts even when they were aware of their adverse effects. Happily, they noted that conscious sensory contact with webstring attractions in natural areas helped them improve their thinking about the value of themselves and nature. "I am grateful to share and learn with all of you on this course. Doing these activities over and over diversely educates me. Not once have I found an activity that did not expand my relationship with nature in and around me and you, no matter how many times I do it. Each activity has endless life, when shared with nature." From their childhood experiences and their extended contact with nature on their travel/study expeditions, Cohen's students recognized that their contact with nature fulfilled them, the more contact they had the better they felt. The looked forward to extended backpacking trips that they planned because they thought, felt and worked best while on them. Genuine contact with the web of life provided them with a high from peak experiences like nothing else ever had, including the use of drugs. These webstring experiences made sense and were equally supportive of nature and them. While they were not in natural areas, some participants realized that, like it sometimes was when they were home, the loss of webstrings in the life of their psyche due to our nature-separated socialization made them want. To fulfill their continual wanting they dependently and excessively attached to artificial things and nature-disconnected beliefs that made them temporarily feel good. This occurred to the point that their thinking would override sensible information that illuminated the destructive effects of their attachments. In observing this, Cohen could see that our normal insensitivity and discomforting thoughts and feelings about nature were no different that those that prejudiced people held against people of different races creeds or beliefs. He became convinced that industrial life socialized people to be prejudiced against nature because he recognized that the term “prejudice” conveyed that we held an unreasonable attitude that was unusually resistant to rational influence. He went a step further by identifying that the “unusual resistance” was caused by our industrial socialization, for profit, emotionally bonding, usually by the age of six years old, our natural webstrings attractions to artificial things and stories whose side effects were detrimental and eroded well being. In Prejudice Against Nature, a guidebook for the liberation of self and planet, Cohen's 1983 Cobblesmith book that was reviewed and accepted for publication by the education department of the National Audubon Society and by editors at MacMillan, he described how, from the day we were born, our socialization prejudiced us against the momentous contributions to the well being of human life, and all life, that was made by nature's web of life. He noted that through natural attraction all members of the web, to their mutual benefit, contributed equally to produce nature's optimums of life, diversity and cooperation. He said that it was reasonable to recognize that every aspect of life was given an equal, natural attraction, right to life in order for life to best support itself by maintaining the health, growth and diversity of the web of life. In addition, the experiences of his expedition education groups also demonstrated how our socialization prejudiced us against respecting or embracing the natural world as sensory webstring attractions whose flow, when we didn't block it, ordinarily strengthened and balanced the life of our psyche, thoughts and feelings. Cohen said that it was reasonable for our prejudice against nature to be identified for the prejudice, or rape, that it was. Sadly, he remembered a young child he knew at Camp Turkey Point in 1945, Michael Schwerner, who, as an adult, was one of the three civil rights workers murdered by the Ku Klux Klan in 1964. He felt that Michael did not risk putting his life on the line just to correct a misunderstanding or to complete incomplete information. Michael's rational passion called to him because racial prejudice was hurting the rights of human life, people of color were being hung from trees. Cohen recognized that, similarly, our prejudice against nature had wounded or killed the web of life in the ongoing and excessive nature-insensitive war that industrial society had, for profit, declared against defenseless and non-literate nature. Unless people sensed the horror, unfairness and pain inflicted by this war, they would remain desensitized and prejudiced. As the protectors of civil rights, peace, labor, equality and social justice demonstrated, the correct word, “prejudice,” brought the passion of the heart into people's reasoning. It motivated them to act when life was treated unfairly. For this reason, identifying prejudice as prejudice was reasonable and important. Cohen became aware of information from a study by the Atomic Energy Commission to discover if and how people might be affected by the fallout from itd planned first Atomic Bomb test in New Mexico in 1945. The study reported that we live indoors over 95 percent of the time. Along with his personal observations and those of his expedition participants, this convinced Cohen that it was industrial society's prejudice against nature that influenced its citizens to excessively live indoors. Another inquiry suggested that in Industrial Society people live with 99.9 percent of their thinking separated from and out of tune with the web of life and its life-supportive ways. The well being that his students and he enjoyed when living and learning in natural areas also convinced him that the “normal” disconnection of our psyche from the flow of webstrings was a form of sensory deprivation that desensitized us to natural life and triggered many dysfunctions and disorders. Nature's Perfection Through the determinations he made by perceiving through the non-prejudicial filter of the webstring model, it became clear to Cohen that our excessive and prejudicial disconnection from nature prevented our thinking from validating and respecting that nature had a perfection of its own. Nature's perfection was the attraction sensitivity that the natural world's webstrings used to correct, organize, transform, renew and perpetuate nature in ways that sustained nature's optimums of life, cooperation and balance over the eons. The web of life community achieved this self-perfection without producing garbage, pollution or our excessive abusiveness, disorders, stress, isolation and insanity. These were the qualities that made nature perfect in its own way. It made sense to Cohen that we genetically inherited the ability to support and enjoy nature's perfection because we were born as part of nature. We belonged. Natural beings were our webstring kin and community. As a seamless continuum of nature itself, our nature was also perfect. It was our prejudiced against nature “red ribbon” stories, along with their technological manifestation, that destructively separated our thinking from the perfection of our nurturing webstring origins. The effects of our prejudice disturbed us into our unbalanced excessiveness and this was a challenge we had yet to face. A participant's email to Cohen described her experience: “I find that reconnecting with nature involves stepping out of the fixed boundaries of the cultural reality we have all grown up with and lived by. Stepping out of one's reality strategy, as Bandler and Grinder referred to it, is one of the most frightening things in the world for a human being. I know the only reason I was able to do it through this program was because for so long - most of my life actually - the reality I was expected to accept didn't fit together for me. It seemed all wrong. So my whole life I've been looking for something, anything, that would help me understand why what seemed real to everyone else didn't seem very real or make much sense to me. Finally through PNC things now make sense, including why so much in our culture doesn't make sense. But nonetheless there was some real pain, grief, and disillusionment in realizing how a skewed our normal view of reality is. There was many a month of feeling sad, not confused for at last I was not confused, but just sad. I still struggle with how one like myself can fit into the manmade reality of our culture without disconnecting from nature to do so. So, surely I do understand how difficult and foreign it is for others to know what reconnecting with nature means.” Webstring Origins When he considered the web of life demonstration from the point of view of the role webstrings played in it, Cohen suggested that the web of life community emanated from an original natural attraction “ball of string.” The original natural attraction was attracted to evolving into a flowing, pristine river of life that included atomic particles and minerals and that entirely consisted of dancing and resonating webstring attraction relationships within and between all of its currents. The flow of the river strengthened its well being and prevented its pollution by growing into an ever-increasing diversity of natural attraction currents. Each current had the ability to sustain itself in balance by establishing mutual supportive natural attraction relationships within and around it. Each current was attracted to live, recycle and support its life by supporting the life of the river. The greater was the diversity, strength and recycling powers of the differing river currents, the stronger was the life and perfection of the river, and vice versa. Cohen knew he was not alone when he discovered on the Internet that Barry Lopez had said “To put your hands in a river is to feel the chords that bind the earth together." The purpose of the river of life appeared to be to simply follow its natural attraction to support life. In the webstring model, one source of life is the original natural attraction (the ball of string) following its natural attraction to support life. From the beginning of our universe, each new moment and experience strengthened the previous moment by making it more attractive in the next moment. "I did the activity that directs you to visit a natural area and reasonably learn to sense it and the flow of its systems. You then try to determine where nature ends and you begin. I was surprised and grateful because in 20 minutes I discovered a new depth of who I really am and what has happened to me." Cohen observed that since many people are motivated to praise, adore, defend, kill or die for their God, people must have biologically inherited the ability to experience a strong love for God or a similar being or energy. This suggested to him that “God” must naturally be very attractive, or the most attractive. If God existed, God may have created this universe from His/Her attractiveness. He/She may have made other universes from His/Her vast knowledge, power or greatness. However, if we were to validate and trust the sensibility of the web of life model and our webstring natural attraction experiences, it made sense that our universe could be constructed of God's attractiveness. That attractiveness could be the source of the original “ball of string” in the web of life demonstration. That ball grew into at least 53 natural webstring attractions the we could sense and feel, that we all held in common and could find and share through webstring activities and experiences in natural areas. Each webstring was conscious that it was attractive and what it was attracted to, each was sensitive to where and when greater attraction relationships could be established for the growth and diversity of attractiveness. It was intelligent to grow and strengthen to the benefit of all. “It
seemed reasonable to assume the Ospreys were intelligent as well as
webstring conscious of what was happening in their non-literate
world. We watched them build their nest on our television antenna
the first year. It seemed attractive to them. Everything they did
made sense if their attraction was to support life by contributing
additional healthy young Ospreys to it. They defended their nest,
located fish and brought them to each other as they took turns guarding
the nest. That winter, a windstorm blew the nest off the TV
antenna. When the Ospreys returned in the spring they rebuilt the
nest on the antenna only to have the next winter's wind remove it
again. The following spring, they built their nest elsewhere.
This suggested that, without reading an instruction manual, they were
webstring conscious of their past two years of experience with the
antenna and were intelligent enough not to repeat them.
Similarly, scientists have watched bacterial colonies change their
shape when environmental conditions did not support them and this could
only occur if webstrings made genetic changes take place. - Anonymous Webstring Participant To help his participants remember to seek and identify the ball, the qualities of webstrings and their contribution to each moment, Cohen coined the acronym, NIAL. It brought to mind the natural Nameless, Intelligent, Attractions that we experience as Loves and that can be supportive and supported in our every relationship. We generate our troubles when we omit them. Nature's Perfection “The average American is exposed to about 3000 advertising messages a day, and globally corporations spend over $620 billion each year to make their products seem desirable and to get us to buy them.” Through the Webstring Model, Cohen concluded that it is our media-flooded and material-dependent life in industrial society along with its socialized prejudice against nature stories that support the excessive disconnection of our thinking and time from nature. He saw that by nature-connecting webstring activities helping people genuinely reconnect their thinking with nature, people could help webstrings flow through the life of their psyche and help them transform the flaws in our nature-disconnected thinking and feeling into mutually supportive relationships, like nature's perfection works. "I am actually finding that doing these activities indoors is good for me in that I often feel disconnected when I have needed to be indoors. By working with the fish and plants in my office, this has allowed me to find that connection that can recharge me in smaller places, rather than just assuming that I have to be outside standing next to the trees or forests or mountains. I get lots of that, and of course it is very easy to connect with the BIG picture, but it has been good to learn to connect with the smaller, less obvious things as well." The Rationale of this Article This article uses the same practical logic and procedure that is used in updated research to solve unsolvable questions or problems from the past. For example, today, investigators rely on the recent discovery that DNA can help us more accurately identify individuals, other forms of life and past relationships. By reasonably applying today's DNA identification procedures to historic events, researchers discover new truths about the past. The same reasoning is used in the sciences of Geology and Archaeology, we apply today's advanced information and logic to past events. Similarly, this article uses a recent tool, the Webstring Natural Attraction Model, to increase our understanding of nature's ways and how to constructively relate to them. The Model helps us examine and interpret sensory evidence from the past and present, evidence that has seldom been recognized or appreciated because the Webstring Model and its 150 nature-connecting activities have not been available to help us in this quest. It helps us recognize how the results of using the Model make a contribution to the well-being of all, it contributes to well being by validating that the Model has merit and is available. The Webstring Model is trustable because it is built on direct sensory evidence from contact with natural areas, with nature, the real thing. A central concept in science and the scientific method is that all evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is, dependent on evidence or consequences that are observable by the senses. On his website, Cohen described how the experiences of its participant's built trust in the model and what they learned from its process: I am not where you are, I don't know you, I can't see or hear you, yet I am accurate in my belief that you are reading these words right now. Isn't it an undeniable fact that you are reading them? The Core Problem In his book Reconnecting With Nature, Cohen notes that if we are to prevent the increasing environmental and social disasters that face us, it is sensible to have the means to clearly identify and address the elusive core of how and why, to our loss, we continue to deteriorate personal, social and environmental well being against our will and better judgment. The heart of our major problems is that our thinking is flawed. It is prejudiced against nature. Our prejudice misleads us and it is biased against tools that can help us correct the flaws. Cohen said that our key challenge was that we didn't recognize that we didn't acknowledge that industrial society suffered because it was deeply prejudiced against nature. We didn't believe that this unseen prejudice biased our thinking, arts, science and creativity and that this reduced the well-being of personal and global life. Instead, we socialized ourselves to celebrate that our excessive ways and exploitation of nature was progress and economic growth and that it was an expression of our superior intelligence, human spirit and God-given rights. He said this was similar to the KKK not addressing the harm that resulted from its prejudicial relationship to people of color and their rights to life and happiness. Instead, the KKK justified their destructive ways with the incomplete story that America was settled by and for Christian Whites and therefore people of color had no rights here. With respect to our prejudicial relationship with nature, this was like us saying that the whole web of life itself had less rights to life than we do. Cohen went so far as to suggest that if the KKK or Nazis were allowed to meet their goals and cleanse the world of even one race and its genetic makeup, this was no different than how our prejudice against nature allowed us to knowledgeably bring even one species to extinction and eradicate its genetic makeup from the world. Significant Questions Here are some questions that the Webstring Natural Attraction Model helps us explore to increase personal, social and environmental well being: How can industrial society find a solution to its greatest problem when it has not identified that problem? Since we are part of Nature, what is the major difference that makes us deteriorate the environment while everything else in Nature enhances it? What produces the wanting void in our psyche, the discomfort, greed, and loneliness that produces distorted human thinking and the social and environmental disorders that result? How can we restore to our thinking the missing 48 sensory intelligences that contemporary society has psychologically buried in our subconscious? Do our stories or relationships in industrial society interrupt the vital flow of natural systems through us so our thinking loses the benefits of nature's grace, balance and self-correcting ways? Does this loss lead us to destructively trespass and unbalance the whole of life, including our life?Webstrings and the Source of our Prejudice Against Nature As described above, applying the Webstring Model today helps us scientifically sense and feel that humanity is a seamless continuum of natural systems. As the cycles of these systems dance and flow within, about and through us, including the life of our psyche, they grow and sustain nature's optimums of life, diversity and well-being. As demonstrated by the pre-Columbian natural world and its people in North America, things in nature, including people, seldom cause or suffer the pollution and excessive abusiveness, greed and disorders that result from the nature-disconnected ways of industrial society. In 1979, to help people understand the origins of our prejudice against nature and the hurtful effects of our unbalanced relationship with our planet, Cohen published an account of the following true occurrence in his Cobblesmith book Across the Running Tide, One of the fascinating events of the school year was our visit to the controversial Leaky prehistoric archeology site in Calico, California. Here were the remains of stone axes allegedly chipped out by stone-age people more that 50,000 year ago. The archeologist showed us how to make stone axes in their ancient way, using rocks as hammers to cut and chip the stone. The students used rocks as hammers all morning and successfully made several axes. We then proceeded to Death Valley, arriving in a blinding dust storm. We immediately proceeded to set up our tents on extremely hard clay soil, so hard that we could neither hand-push nor foot-stamp in our tent pegs as we normally did. I was surprised to find all but two of the students standing in line, coughing, with eyes tearing, all waiting to use the one single geology hammer we had to hammer in their tent stakes. Only Dan Chuck and I were not on line. We already hammered in our stakes using rocks on the ground all around us. |