.



Michael J. Cohen, Ed.D.
Lead Faculty
Greenwich University Applied Ecopsychology

 

 

ECO 541 PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH FOR APPLIED

ECOPSYCHOLOGY/INTEGRATED ECOLOGY (3 credits)

 

Michael J. Cohen, Ed.D.

Director, Project NatureConnect

P. O. Box 1605

Friday Harbor, WA 98250 USA

Tel: (360) 378-6313

Email: nature@pacificrim.net

Website: www.ecopsych.com

 

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION

ECO 541 Participatory Research Techniques for Applied Ecopsychology/

Integrated Ecology (3 credits)

Students will investigate the available literature on participatory

research techniques. This may include readings in the literature pertaining

to implementing system-transforming innovations (Bushe and Shani),

participatory action research in the workplace (Whyte), reflection in

action (Schon), reframing organizational culture (Frost, et. al.) and

self-reliant initiative (Fals-Borda), as well as other qualitative and

action science methodologies. Students will identify an appropriate

mini-study, apply techniques from their readings, complete the study and

prepare a technical paper of at least ten double-spaced typewritten pages

referencing the literature and describing the value of participatory

research techniques to the fields of Applied Ecopsychology/Integrated Ecology.

 

PREREQUISITES

Students must complete all of the core competencies of the degree field

before undertaking this course.

 

COURSE TOPICS

*library and Internet literature search

*foundational readings

*understanding effective writing style

*effectively draw upon the knowledge of other scholars

*structuring a publishable quality manuscript

 

-Optional Topics

*Reconnecting with natural senses

*Psychology of nature negatives

*Psychological origins of our separation from nature

 

COURSE OBJECTIVES

 

This advanced readings course is intended to empower the participants to:

*effectively search the literature in preparation for the conduct of a mini

study.

*analyze, summarize the research literature

*present findings from reading and research in an effective scholarly

discussion, with proper referencing of your academic arguments, and with a

publishable quality manuscript

 

 

BRIEF NEED STATEMENT

Instructional programs for mid-career adults are effective, many times,

only to the extent that the participants can individualize their studies

for immediate application within the professional environment. General

programs of study must make provisions for students to undertake highly

advanced inspections of the scholarly literature to allow an individualized

and specialized preparation. Participants, motivated to explore aspects of

the subject matter in greater detail, should be encouraged and guided in

this pursuit. In fact, it is essential that educational institutions

maximize the relevance of advanced studies to the demands and expectations

of the community, business, corporate, governmental, and professional

arenas within which the students live and work. Such strategies which

relate learning more closely to actual demands and expectations of life and

work and what educators call "reality" permit more effective preparation

of the participants for the real challenges they will face in the

professional arena. Students who learn in this manner are advantaged

within the marketplace and highly desired by employers.

 

Effective investigation of higher level theories, principles, and practices

is an essential elements in the development of the successful professional

practitioner in every field of endeavor. Rigorous programs of advanced

level reading have lead many to achieve higher ideals with the

competencies, wisdom, values, and motivations necessary to stand out

effectively within their professions and thereby make meaningful

contributions to the betterment of the human condition.

 

 

COURSE AUDIENCE

Open as an elective to all graduate and undergraduate students with the

permission of the instructor.

 

FACULTY-STUDENT COMMUNICATIONS

 

-Telephone Contacts

The student will initiate an initial telephone conference with the

instructor within one week of enrollment to clarify a plan of action for

the course. This initial contact will help familiarize the student and

instructor with one another, and permit the transmission of clear

expectations for completion of course requirements. Periodic telephone

interaction , as required, at student's expense, should be continued for

the duration of the course.

 

-Email Communications

Frequent email communications between student and instructor should be

initiated and continued for the duration of the course.

 

-Alternative Communications

Students may send communications and materials via postal service, as

appropriate. Chat room sessions, when available, can be held on a weekly

basis.

 

 

COURSE DELIVERY STYLE

Students conduct a broad based and exhaustive search for literature in a

specialized advanced area of study and pursue foundational and advanced

level readings under the direction of the instructor. The readings should

relate to a specific thesis set as the foundation for the literature

review. To the extent that it reflects upon an overarching thesis

statement, the readings may be an indepth review of a single author's works

or an historical or cross-cultural survey within a defined area of study.

The participants prepare journal notations concerning the salient points

from the literature and creates an annotated bibliography of the readings.

The student's review of the literature should include the reading of

reviews and critiques of the literature under investigation, especially

concerning the validity and applicability of research studies or theories

within a range of "real world" settings. The participant creates a

academic paper which contains a highly effective scholarly presentation

with an academic argument which reflects upon the thesis and literature in

a creative manner. The manuscript must adhere to an acceptable manual of

writing style and be of publishable quality.

 

 

REQUIRED COURSE MATERIALS

 

-Required Textbook

 

Action and Knowledge : Breaking the Monopoly With Participatory Action-

Research Orlando Fals-Borda, / Paperback / Published 1991

(AMAZON BOOKS)

 

 

-Recommended Bibliography

Students may select from the general bibliographic materials, and the

bibliographies in the Greenwich University Research Methods Bibliography List.

They contain, as appropriate. See www.amazon.com for publication details and

availability.

 

 

COURSE ASSIGNMENTS

 

-Assignment #1: Collaborative Communication with Instructor

Initiate telephone contact with the instructor to clarify the plan of

action for the course and initiate collaborative email communications.

Maintain email contact with the instructor for the duration of the course.

Initiate and continue journal notations concerning all communications with

the instructor.

 

-Assignment #2: Literature Review

Conduct a library and Internet search for scholarly literature including

the journals, out-of-print, and unpublished works, as appropriate,

specifically related to the selected topic under investigation within the

course, under the direction and guidance of the instructor. By design,

this should be an exhaustive but narrow and well focused gathering of

literature within the defined area under investigation and include reviews

and critiques of the written works under investigation, and a review of the

foundational writings which have informed the authors of the works under

investigation. Review the literature and assesses its effectiveness as a

tool within the scholarly presentation and academic argument. Make

journal notations concerning all readings and prepare an annotated

bibliography which identifies the many ways the literature informs

practice.

 

-Assignment #3: Annotated Bibliography

Carefully review and prepare an exhaustive annotated bibliography

clarifying the contributions of the written works to the scholarly

discourse. Prepare these annotations in accordance with acceptable means

of annotation and submit these as requested by the instructor in a formal

written presentation.

 

-Assignment #4: Scholarly Paper

Within the requirements for a course final paper found at

http://www.ecopsych.com/eco500paper.html prepare a major paper

containing a scholarly discussion of your findings.

Students are to gather insight into the differences between theory (from

the readings) and practice (from the field observations), identify and

clarify these incongruities, and propose solutions to better understanding

these differences. The paper should be approximately 15 double-spaced

typewritten pages and include thorough referencing of the literature and

observations.

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL LEARNING RESOURCES

 

-Internet Resources

*Guide to Internet Research

http://users.southeast.net/~drgwen/index.html

*Gateway to Academic Resources on Internet

<http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/gw/>

*Research Guide on Internet

http://www.lib.odu.edu/start/index.html

 

-Textbooks

*Specialty Books

5833 Industrial Drive

Athens, OH 45701

(800) 466-1365

(614) 594-2274

Fax (614) 593-3045.

Email: order@specialty-books.com

http://www.specialty-books.com

 

*Amazon Books

549 South Dawson

P.O. Box 81410

Seattle, WA 98108-1310

(800) 201-7575

(206) 694-2992.

Fax (206) 694-2950.

Email: orders@amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com

Books can be ordered directly from the Web site.

 

 

INDIVIDUALIZATION OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENTS

The primary purpose of this course is to provide opportunities for students

to carefully inspect the full reaches of the advanced literature within a

defined area of study. This course allows the student to select a topic for

advanced reading, identify the appropriate literature, prepare a thesis for

the central focus of the course and undertake the structuring of a

scholarly paper.

 

COURSE EVALUATION

The instructor will evaluate the completeness and effectiveness of the

student's written materials, including the annotated bibliography, and the

scholarly paper.

 

The instructor will reflect upon the following expectations in evaluating

the work of the student:

 

*detail of presentations

*depth and maturity of the literature review

*richness and diversity of the material presented

*clarity of references to the scholarly readings

*focus and conceptual quality

*richness and coherence in translation of academic theories and concepts

*appropriateness of applications

*quality of writing of the scholarly presentation

 

 

COURSE GRADING DETERMINANTS

The course grade will be calculated according to the following formula:

 

*annotated bibliography 30%

*scholarly paper 70%

 

 

COURSE COMPLETION TIMETABLE

While the student is expected to carry out and complete all assignments and

meet the expectations of the instructor within 180 days from the start

date, students are encouraged to pursue the course requirements according

to the following timetable.

 

Week #1: Make telephone contact with the instructor for the purpose of

establishing the plan of action and scheduling the timeline and mode of

communications for the duration of the course. Secure a recommended

bibliography from the instructor and begin to gather text and journal

literature in support of the special area of advanced reading.

 

Week #2: Submit by email a summarization of the agreed upon plan of action

for the course. Establish a thesis statement as the basis for the

approach to the advanced reading. Continue to gather literature and begin

readings and maintenance of journal notations (which must continue for the

duration of the project) related to all readings. Begin creation of an

annotated bibliography of the readings undertaken.

 

Week #6: Continue to read and review the literature. Maintain journal

notations related to all readings. Begin to organize your thinkings

related to the manuscript outline for the academic argument of the

scholarly paper. Maintain frequent email communications with instructor.

 

Week #12: Structure a complete manuscript outline for the scholarly paper

including those sections as directed by the approved manual of style

selected to guide the preparation of the manuscript.

 

Week #16: Submit the annotated bibliography. Finalize the first draft of

the paper and submit to two colleagues for peer review, critique and

recommendations related to the effectiveness of the presentation and the

maturity of the academic argument. Make the changes as merited from the

peer review.

 

Week #20: Submit the scholarly paper.

 

Week #22: Receipt of effective feedback from the instructor.

 

SPECIAL NOTES AND INSTRUCTIONS

 

-Course Completion

The grade of Incomplete may be given ONLY AFTER discussion with the

instructor and only if there is an extremely good reason to give such a

grade. An Incomplete will NOT be given because a student is "behind" in

work, needs extra time, simply because s/he wants to delay the completion

of the assignments. It is important that you turn in assignments within

the parameters of the agreed timeline. However, there are often unforeseen

circumstances will may befall any of us, therefore, I will be patient with

you in the event of some personal crisis. Don't surprise me at the last

minute, call me, email me, and we will work it out.

 

-Thoughts about Writing.

Purchase a collegiate writing style manual. If you are unclear which is

the appropriate manual, please contact me and we can discuss this important

issue. All written work should adhere to the writing style and manuscript

preparation guidelines described in your style manual. Pay extra special

attention to the rules related to referencing and citation of the academic

literature. In all circumstances, you will be expected to acknowledge th

works of others which have informed the work you wish to submit as your

own. If you are unclear with regard to this expectation, ask before you

begin writing.

 

-Academic Integrity

Academic dishonest in any of its forms, including cheating, plagiarism,

misuse of the University web site, failure to comply with guidelines for

the preparation of a scholarly manuscript, and all aspects of professional

ethics, will not be tolerated. Any form of academic dishonesty is grounds

for dismissal from the program.

 

 

FACULTY CONTACT INFORMATION

 

Michael J. Cohen, Ed.D.

Director, Project NatureConnect

P. O. Box 1605

Friday Harbor, WA 98250 USA

Tel: (360) 378-6313

Email: nature@pacificrim.net

Website: www.ecopsych.com

 

Communications should take place during daytime working hours in the

western time zone or by appointment.

 


 

Project NatureConnect
Institute of Global Education
Special NGO consultant to United Nations Economic and Social Council.
P.O. Box 1605 Friday Harbor WA 98250
(360) 378-6313
nature@pacificrim.net
www.ecopsych.com

.